As a bioethicist, I do indeed know the meaning of 'eugenic'. The idea that those who cannot naturally conceive but can through biomedical intervention would have genetically inferior offspring is arrant nonsense. These tech advances exist for precisely the opposite purpose.
It is clear that the British are now hopelessly degenerate.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/may/31/care-failing-those-with-learning-disability
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/in-what-year-will-britain-be-100.html
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/the-sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html
There is no way you can prove that the offspring of these LGBT parents are equal or better than the offspring of married couples.
Also, the offspring of parents who use IVF did not come from sperm who won the race to the ovum. They were just parachuted into it, like an unwanted London metrosexual homosexual Tory MP into the shires. And that is why the whole process is dysgenic and a total waste of time, energy and money.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/may/31/care-failing-those-with-learning-disability
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/in-what-year-will-britain-be-100.html
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/the-sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html
There is no way you can prove that the offspring of these LGBT parents are equal or better than the offspring of married couples.
Also, the offspring of parents who use IVF did not come from sperm who won the race to the ovum. They were just parachuted into it, like an unwanted London metrosexual homosexual Tory MP into the shires. And that is why the whole process is dysgenic and a total waste of time, energy and money.