If you could switch places with someone for a day, who would it be?
Donald Trump. I'd walk backwards on all fours, naked, with his stupid roadkill toupee on my ass, and his picture with his mouth cut out and placed over my butt hole.
do you ever write reviews? if so, do you give stars freely or do they really have to earn them? i realized that i never give 2 stars. what does 2 stars even mean?
I don't write product reviews, but sometimes I'll write seller reviews if the service was really good, or really bad. Once, I gave a two star review for a "product that was dinged up. I was going to give one star for saying it was in perfect condition when it obviously wasn't, but upgraded it to a two because it took so long for it to ship, I had to assume the seller went through the trouble of walking it over himself." He didn't think it was very funny :(Also, I give terrible reviews to people who use that BS bubble wrap that won't pop >:(
How can I stop feeling bad for being gay when the bible says it's wrong 😞
Uh, I've never read the bible, nor am I religious. I'll answer the question, but keep in mind that my opinion is not based on what you would call religious knowledge. If you still want to read, here goes:As I understand it, the bible promotes all kinds of violence: blood sacrifice, stoning, rape, murder. You don't do any of those, do you? What's one more thing when it's so trivial by comparison?If that's unsatisfactory, how about this: If you believe God is almighty, then you believe he created you as you are. Why would he do that if it was wrong? Because it's not. There's nothing wrong with you. PEOPLE wrote the bible. People who said it was the word of God. No one has any way of knowing how much truth there is to that. Don't stand in judgement or spread hatred like other people who claim they are devoted to God do. Just be a good person, do your best, and trust that God won't turn his back on you because of who you love.I'm sorry I can't be more help. Best of luck to you, and keep your chin up :)
Fair enough. It's not very common, though. I suppose if one's ancestors were colonists, and almost exclusively procreated with descendants of other colonists, then one can claim being of the "master race", depending on the country. Obviously, smaller or isolated countries would have higher rates of colonists getting busy with natives (otherwise they'd all be inbred by now :s). So, while I would disagree, if someone wants to think just having colonist blood makes them white, it's no skin off my back.This would also depend on who you consider to be white. Some people say most or all western Europeans are white, while others say only people from certain countries are considered white. So, unless the predominant language of your mother land is English, German, or Gaelic, you aren't universally accepted as white.Now, what about immigration? There have been times where people left Europe for Latin America. Most notably, during WWII. So this brought in fresh Caucasian blood into the gene pool (mostly to the larger countries). Even then, their progeny (progenies?) don't go around saying they're Caucasian (unless they're those kinds of people that think it makes them better than everyone else). I have cousins who are part German, as in, their grandparents came from Germany, not "Our last name is German but no one we knew personally came from there." and they don't consider themselves white.Anyway, this was about someone throwing a hissy fit over nice people being liked, and trying to attribute it to some stupid ethnic thing. You don't have to be white to be liked, and white people are most certainly as capable of being kind as anyone else.
you are all racist bc your queens the popular girls glinda applepop serena and kathryn are all white. it is not a coincidence that they are loved even tho they are evil and non - whites are victims of false accusations.
I think these guys are what's called "Heteroflexible". Meaning, they're straight, but they do partake in occasional homosexual activity. I don't think it can be called gay or bisexual, since it doesn't really seem like there is any attraction to the men. There's no connection to be made with another person; it's about self pleasure, after all. I could see it as being bi-curious, too, at least at first.
I don't know about this last assassin we recruited, CAustin. He excels in weaponry and hand to hand, and he's proficient in agility. But, he keeps failing the stealth test. He gets through the obstacles well enough, but not without losing the element of surprise. Maybe we need to go younger.🔪
Do you agree that being nice all the time doesn't get one anywhere and you have to be an a-hole/bitch to get by in life?
Well, it all really depends on one's definition of an a-hole/b*tch, and where it is they want to be. Being assertive, competitive, and no-nonsense does not equate to being ruthless imo, and are good qualities to have in a professional setting. Not so much in a social one. I like the term "Firm, but fair."I do agree that being nice all the time will likely get you stepped on, but I don't see that being a jerk will help you much, in any kind of environment. People will recognize you for what you are. If you're nice, you may be an asset to have around or in higher positions, because people will want be around you or work for you. Or, people may take advantage because they know you go the extra mile without asking anything in return. Being an a-hole/b*tch can be an asset, because you will make sure things get done, but, you may be kept from climbing the ladder too high because you're a possible threat and/or severely disliked.I don't think it's a good idea to classify oneself as either one or the other. Some situations require patience, and others a fire under their asses. So it's best to be able to evaluate situations, so you can use the method the specific situation calls for.
I haven't! People used to recommend this movie to me because I'm afraid of clowns and I was a Christopher Titus fan. Those clowns are creepy, but they're not the specific type of clowns that terrify me, so maaaybe one day I'll give it a watch. I do hear it's a good laugh :)
Today, UK MPs are debating whether or not to legalise assisted dying. What are your thoughts on this? Should the relatives of terminally ill people be allowed to help them to end their lives?
I believe people should have the right to end their lives whenever they wish. Especially if they are terminally ill. When they have nothing to look forward to but excruciating pain, I think it's cruel to make them stay alive as long as possible for the family's sake. Some people want to leave this world with their dignity, and not just as the shell of a human being, and I can't blame them at all for it. It's a bit trickier for people who aren't ill, but I still believe there should be resources available to those who wish to end their lives: therapy, settling of affairs, insurance claims, etc. All they have as of now are hotlines where people tell them to think of others, or professionals making assumptions and essentially telling them to get over themselves and quit being a baby. It's no wonder people don't seek help before attempting it. I'm an optimist, but I don't think it's right to lie to a stranger and promise things will get better. No one can know that, and no one can know how long it will be until they do. You can't assume someone will think it worthwhile to suffer for years and years on the off chance that something good comes along. Basically what I'm saying is, people shouldn't be forced to live a miserable life. If they have nothing but pain and suffering, regardless of whether it's physical or emotional, it's inhumane to force them to endure for the sake of those that would be left behind.
How do you feel about edu video games for children that focus on controversial topics? Like 'History 2: Slave Trade' (it's a real game) https://goo.gl/kE2WrP It's a game to teach kids about what it was like to be involved in the trans-Atlantic slave trade. IYO, is this helpful or appropriate?
I vaguely remember this game. If I recall correctly, it was really bare bones in the history department, but there were all sorts of racial slurs in it. I can understand it not being very historically accurate, as it still needed to be age appropriate, but it didn't really have much beyond a "people aren't property" lesson. It certainly didn't depict many of the more serious issues surrounding slavery. It looks like the game is also heavy on the dialogue. I can't imagine that anyone that young would concentrate long enough to understand, let alone retain what is learned.I'm all for anything that turns educational things into something fun. It sparks curiosity and leads to quests for knowledge. I don't think this game falls under that category, though. So no, I don't think this particular project is helpful, unless it's a springboard for something better to come.Is it appropriate? It's hard to say. I think what is and isn't appropriate for children should be decided for each individual child by their parents. Some kids can handle certain things at a younger age than others, and some can't handle certain things at all as children (think of why we have tv, movie, video game ratings). That's not to say that something done properly should be the sole source of education outside of a classroom. Things like this, if done right, are a good way for parents to also have a hand in their kids' education (or learn along with them), build on/improve relationships, and establish a line of communication with their children.
💖Greatest Love Songs - HIM💖 "Open your arms Let me show you what love can be like. It is all tears And it will be til the end of your time. Come closer, my love. Will you let me tear your heart apart?".💖Wish You Were Here - Pink Floyd💖 "Remember when you were young You shone like the sun. Now there's a look in your eyes Like black holes in the sky.".💖Vulgar Display of Power - Pantera💖 "In my life All I wanted Was the keeping Of someone like you As it turns out Deeper within me Love was twisted and pointed at you".💖Walk Among Us - Misfits💖 "Angels take their time in falling come alive in the house that screams when I sin, I sin real good when I sin, I sin for sure".💖GRRR - The Rolling Stones💖 "Better listen little girl You go on walking down the street I ain't got no love, I ain't the kind to meet 'Cause you'll never break, never break, never break, never break This heart of stone"
What would you think if your partner were still interacting with her/his ex('s)? Does it warrant suspicion, or do you take the liberal route and accept that she/he has a right to remain friends with the people who saw your partner naked (and the rest)? Q2: Did you tell the truth?
I wouldn't mind, within reason. If it was a long time friend that he decided to try a relationship with, I wouldn't be suspicious at all. Quite the opposite, I'd be impressed that their friendship was not only salvaged, but remains strong. If the friendship didn't develop until after they dated, then I might be wary, but I tend to be liberal with my trust when it comes to my guy. As long as he never gives me a reason to doubt him, there won't be suspicion on my end. If he ever does give me reason to suspect anything, I'd just leave.
To what extent do you agree with this quote: "No one can make you feel inferior without your consent"?
Absolutely. In order for someone to hurt you, you first need to give them the power to do it. An opinion has to matter before it can affect anything ;)