Is it better to be invincible to emotional harm or physical harm?
Neither of those sound appealing to me. I've been inside of a state where I couldn't feel anything on an emotional level and I wouldn't want to experience that again. Considering lack of emotions is not to be considered better, I will go with neither is lack of physical harm. If you couldn't feel, either emotional or physical, how will you know when it's time for you to walk away? To stop? To not touch?
Liked by:
Stiles and Malia
Cash Bowen