I would assume that there is actually, because national-socialism was very specific to a people, time and place.+1 answer in: “What are the main diffferences between your philosophy and the philosophy of national-socialism?”
I have to be honest and say that I don't know enough about the philosophy of national-socialism, which I'm led to believe was incredibly detailed in its planning, to be able to give a proper answer.+1 answer Read more
It particularly pains me to see a Nordic woman with a Sub-Saharan African. Given the preciousness of European wombs as a proportion of the global population, a white woman miscegenating and throwing thousands of years of genetic heritage down the toilet is particularly destructive. Traditionally, a woman's womb was seen as the most precious part of the tribe's patrimony, whereas men miscegenating was seen as infiltrating another tribe's bloodline, a victory if anything. Traditionally a woman would only miscegenate if she was abducted and raped by an enemy tribe, the result of the men of her own tribe being too weak to protect her from sexual rivals. As a result, the sight of a white woman with a man from another tribe has a demoralising effect on a level so profound that the white man may not even be consciously aware of it, because it is a primitive visual symbol that his own tribe has been overcome by stronger men. This is the prime reason that the media bombards us with images of white women and black men, because our enemies know these facts.
I think it is a hoax if for nothing else than the fact that I don't think any "Learned Elders" would be stupid enough to put down all their thoughts in writing like that, for their enemies to conveniently find and publish in a book.
I think it is addressed, in the sense that they are a non-White group which as such has no place in White societies. While the Chinese do not prey on Whites with violence or rape, as the Africans or MENA groups, they work tightly as an impenetrable ethnic group to steadily drain economic resources from the host society to their own group, where it never leaves, impoverishing the host nation. Their behaviour is documented in Macdonald's A People Who Shall Dwell Alone.
It was a hoax. Of course, the media crowed about it, but were silent when it was revealed to be a hoax. Scum.
I don't know.
Edinburgh, the Highlands, and the Borders.
I've never liked Discord. The interface is overwhelming, and I think the format encourages rivers of shit-posting. And now we know that the company can't be trusted.
Sorry, I was recharging.
It's back now.
I gained an average of 200 subs each day of Millenniyule, which I guess means that the whole thing led to about 4000 new subscribers.
What I said was that the act of homosexuality is degenerate because it does not produce or sustain life. This is not an incorrect statement.
She thinks that she is someone who is entitled to a place in our society, rather than only suffered out of our misplaced sense of charity. She is in for a rude awakening.
Homosexuality as a sexual preference and behaviour has always been present in society, if behind closed doors, but it is degenerate because it does not produce or sustain life. However, that is not to say that homosexuals who sympathise with the alt-right could not contribute with their skills, especially given the nature of much activism being anonymous. I think it is important to distinguish the act of homosexuality itself from the homosexual as a recently manufactured political identity, and the gay agenda as a tool of the cultural marxists to attack heterosexuality, masculinity, marriage, the family and by extension, the West.
Under the current paradigm, yes. Because people do not understand that in order to be truly free one must be very responsible, disciplined, virtuous, alert, educated and prepared to fight to defend one's freedom. That is to say, that it takes hard work to be free, for which most people are not capacitated or willing. This leads to any putative freedom soon being lost to another or others who do have these qualities in greater measure, as they will use their superiority to enslave without the inferior even realising. Equality is a lie and only leads to tyranny in the end, as the people pushing "equality" well know, hence why the discourse around "freedom" is so controlled and difficult to critique for the uninitiated.
A mean-spirited hit-piece by a weak, facile man.