Was my question weird? do you want more weird questions? haha :3
I did find your question about what is the place between confusion and utopia a bit cryptic but it made me think. Sure please give me all the weird questions - I am sorry if my answer are a bit boring. :-)
Are you following the Australian open tennis ?? If so ,who are you supporting??
I am following the Australian Open. I always support Federer. On the women's side I do not have a favorite. I was sorry to see Sharpova lose - she is such a fighter but great to see Kerber in good form - perhaps I will support her. I really enjoyed Hsieh battling to a win against Radwanska, though I was also sorry to her lose. Hope you are enjoying the tennis too. :-)
That is great to hear. I will ask you another question but please could you respond on your page rather than in my inbox. If you answer there then we will not lose pieces of the "conversation."
Sure I always even go question for answer and even question for like! But I must say I am feeling the weight of my approach at the moment. :-) It could take me a while to respond...
???
Slaughter the cow? (or is that a goat?)
Ok that was a good answer but maybe i didn't ask the right question...
I meant I wanted a scientific proof for the existence of god which also disproves the evolution theory.
Hi Omar, I am sorry that I did not understand you last question properly.I am a little confused because I thought I did answer your question about giving you a scientific proof for the existence of God.The difference between this question and the last question is that you ask here if I could give a scientific proof for the existence of God which also disproves the theory of evolution.As I think that I have dealt with the first part of the question saying that there is not a scientific proof for the existence of God as God is not the subject the science but rather his creation, I will deal with the second part of the question.Can I scientifically prove that evolution theory is false? No I cannot scientifically prove that the theory of evolution is false and very fortunately as a Catholic I do not have to do that. The Church has said that it is allowable to believe that man's body evolved from animals but it is not allowable to believe that his soul evolved. To put it another way we can believe that God made man's body through a process of evolution. Let me be clear the Church has said this is allowable not that it is required. The Church also allows one to believe that God created the world in six days and so created man body and soul instantly, again the Church says this is allowable but we do not have to believe that.By this the Church is showing us that how exactly the world was made is not essential to our belief in God. At some point science may finally prove or disprove the theory of evolution but this does not change the fact that God created the world out of nothing.I hope that this is helpful. Many blessings!
Okay, I see that you would rather not answer question on your page. Then I wish you well. Many blessings! And have fun drifting which I am sure you do! :-)
Wow, that is very cool! Could I ask if you would answer my questions on your page rather than in my in box. It also helps to prevent bits of the conversation getting lost.
Do you think the allegations about the catholic church priests are true?
It seems clear that there has been a lot of pedophilia. I am only too glad that this has been exposed so that the Church can get her house in order.So terrible for victims and for the priests themselves.Prayers all round!
How are you?
I am well thanks, though it is getting late here and ask.fm is making me tired. :-)
God was a really good idea to explain the mysterious phenomena at the bronze age, but he is not helping us with the modern physics ! every thing your holy book said about the universe was wrong !
God is pure spirit so he is not with in physics.You understand everything about the universe? You understand everything which the Bible says about the universe? If you are talking about physics the Bible is not a physics textbook.I pray that you will talk physics with God for all eternity if you do get to heaven you will be able to and you will never stop learning.Am sure there were men far wiser than us in the bronze age though they were sure to understand less of science than us.Loud speech! Does not make your speech more weighty.Peace and blessings! (Now I am doing it too. :-) )
then I have the right to say that existence is absolute and it just been always there and no one created it :)
This is quite a good answer to me. As I understand it you are saying matter is eternal. Yet matter changes and this does not seem right for that which is eternal.In the first part to this question you seemed to say that an infinite line of creators would solve the problem of having a necessary first uncreated creator but it does not answer the problem you cannot hide behind infinity.You also seem to think that God is limiting yet God is completely infinite without beginning and without end. He is who is. Perhaps that appeals to your idea of infinity?Just a lot of retorts here. Hope something helps further though. Thanks for your thought too.
What I'm saying is that infinity does exist and there is no boundary to the existence, you are telling me that God is the being which is no one created, you are putting a limit there and I don't like limits, if you want to say that God he is absolute then ... tbc
...Please restrict your question to a the space. I will ask you stuff about what you are asking on your page too so you can explain further there. Thanks. :-)
(this is the stupidest question i’ve ever asked) if, hypothetically, you and your best friend were gonna raise children together who carry the baby/who would father the child?
I am a little confused. Are you speaking of having children outside of marriage? I do not believe that is allowed.Or are you speaking of adopting a child? Ideally the child would be place with a mother and a father but a single person could also adopt a child.Or are you speaking of a same sex partnership? I do not think children should be raised in same sex partnerships.Sorry about the confusion.