Ask @pataz1:

Why were so many witnesses brought in a year after the incident? Seems like the Italian Police were trying hard to save their face.

1. I believe that what their initial questions didn't reveal the value of the witnesses. From what I recall of the report of when they initially questioned Quintavalle, they didn't bring up Amanda in their questioning, but it was Amanda that he saw. The reporters are the ones that made them realize the value of their testimony. This is actually a common experience. In the US there was a show that had a cold case where the father went in to the police station on an almost daily basis for several years to get updates on how the search for his daughter's murderer was progressing. It wasn't until the show got involved (media intervention) that it came out that the father had actually seen someone contradictory to that person's testimony, and they broke the case.
So, witnesses can see things, but not know the -meaning- of what they have seen until some time later. This is also similar to Adnan Syed. Asia McClane didn't realize that her witnessing Adnan in the library contradicted the state's timeline until the Serial podcast was released- again, media intervention. She saw something, but didn't know that what she saw had -meaning- in the case until after the case was publicized.

View more

What do you think of Rudy Guede wanting a re-trial now that AK and RS were acquitted of all murder charges?

I think his lawyers are smartly waiting for the supreme court's Motivations to see exactly why the case is being dismissed. Guede's conviction was final and has already been heard by the Supreme Court. My belief is that the only way the Italian courts can resolve the contradiction between rulings will be for an early release for guede.

View more

How could Amanda be at Raf's at 8:45pm and then the crime occur at around 9pm if it were a prank gone awry? Don't you have any better theories?

I said an argument could be made, and provided the outline for it.
As an aside, the time of death is contested; Knox's supporters claimed it was 9pm, because it provided Knox and Sollecito something of an alibi and because it fit with the "burglar interrupted" theory. However the time frame provided was between 9pm an 1am.

View more

Do you think that Amanda was involved in the actual act of killing her or was just a bystander who did nothing to stop it? Marijuana does not make you a violent person so how could she react so violently?

I'm constantly amazed that people find the theory of a group sexual assault to somehow be incomprehensible. I'm particularly surprised that Americans have such difficulties with the theory, since a similar case happened right in their own backyard:
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/facebook-holds-clues-to-teens-gang-rape-6395031
"And for days, Patricia and Jessica had harbored resentment toward each other over a boy, several friends say. Patricia had begun talking to a young man Jessica had liked for months. Around 1 a.m., according to police reports, after hours of smoking weed and listening to hip-hop, Erica silently slid out a bottle of Mace. Then, without saying a word, she sprayed Jessica."
"In an emerging teen culture that values substance abuse, misogyny, hypersexualization, and violence, all the kids from this group use social media to annotate every drug score, sexual conquest, and swig of booze. The status updates, posted without concern for consequences, mark one of the few consistencies in the lives of South Florida's impoverished youth, who bounce from household to household without sustained parenting. Facebook for them has become a very public diary of delinquency and criminality — and it's updated no matter the circumstances.
By the time the kids allowed Jessica to leave, barefoot and slipping in and out of consciousness, Patricia Montes' last status update had already materialized on Facebook. "You're a hoe," wrote the blond 15-year-old, who would soon face charges of capital sexual battery. "Stop trynna act like a saint.""

View more

Do Amanda deserve a compensation for wrongful conviction? I don't think so cause she jailed for slander against Lumbama and one question, how much money are the seven figures? Just curious

There are two voluntarily provided statements that would likely complicate any claim of compensation; Knox's written statement at about 2:00pm on the afternoon of the 6th, and Sollecito's statement to the judge on the 8th. I believe police and the prosecution could point to both these statements as justification for their actions.

View more

If Guede is released and he decides to tell the truth what happened that involved Amanda and Raffale, will they be brought in court again because of evidence confession ?

I highly doubt it. He already blamed them for the murder, and that's part of the case. Repeating that accusation wouldn't likely be enough to do anything, even if he were to fill in details about the specifics.

View more

When they explain the reasoning, will they be a separated in court if the further evidence comes?

All of the evidence possible was collected from the scene and is a part of the 10,000 plus pages of files. The only possible thing would be someone unknown coming forward or one of them changing their story. I doubt anyone would reopen the case on the basis of either one of those.
About the only thing I could think of that would change is if Meredith's missing keys were found... And they had Knox or sollecito's fingerprints on them.

View more

What about Raffale that will have in trial on April ? In what charge ? And how long will he stays in jail there ?

They are both facing slander charges. Sollecito's potential first conviction for slander would likely be minimal and potentially a waived sentence even if convicted: if Knox had a second callunia conviction it would be a stiffer sentence than her initial one.

View more

Why panels judge ignored and decide to switch the decision which there is so much evidence against them? Why ? That is crazy. I view Amanda Knox guilty as charged.

I personally think it has to do with not distinguishing between a broader "participation" and direct participation; in other words, I think some thought the question was "were they involved" (concorso) and some thought the question was "did they personally do the crime." Hellman's court only looked at the latter question and the direct evidence for the latter question, and his court was criticized for not looking at the complete collection of evidence and the circumstances.
We're waiting to see what the supreme court has said about the evidence. From the initial reports I personally believe they too only asked the question "did they personally commit the murder", and said the evidence is insufficient to show they personally committed the murder. However we'll know for certain when the report comes out.

View more

Next