@pataz1

Pat Az

I am so dumbfounded that they got of free after all the damning evidence against them. All the lies and lack of alibis.. Especially AK. Not even a re-trial how do you figure?

I believe they atomized the evidence and looked at it separately, but we won't know until they issue their motivations in 84+ days

Latest answers from Pat Az

Also, I know you're not a fan of Amanda. But do you think Solliceto's DNA could've been planted by the Italian officials?

No, and I've never based my conclusion on the knife or the bra clasp. I believe there is enough other evidence.

Why were so many witnesses brought in a year after the incident? Seems like the Italian Police were trying hard to save their face.

1. I believe that what their initial questions didn't reveal the value of the witnesses. From what I recall of the report of when they initially questioned Quintavalle, they didn't bring up Amanda in their questioning, but it was Amanda that he saw. The reporters are the ones that made them realize the value of their testimony. This is actually a common experience. In the US there was a show that had a cold case where the father went in to the police station on an almost daily basis for several years to get updates on how the search for his daughter's murderer was progressing. It wasn't until the show got involved (media intervention) that it came out that the father had actually seen someone contradictory to that person's testimony, and they broke the case.
So, witnesses can see things, but not know the -meaning- of what they have seen until some time later. This is also similar to Adnan Syed. Asia McClane didn't realize that her witnessing Adnan in the library contradicted the state's timeline until the Serial podcast was released- again, media intervention. She saw something, but didn't know that what she saw had -meaning- in the case until after the case was publicized.

View more

Did they ever find out how Amanda's lamp got into MK's room? What is your theory?

No, they didn't. I think it was used in the early hours of the morning to avoid turning on the house lights. After it was forgotten in the room, I believe there was an attempt to break down the door

Rudy said he wrote something on MK's wall. Is there any proof of that?

Not really. There was none of Rudy's DNA found on a wall. The photos don't show anything recognizable as writing on the walls.

How many hours of your life would you say you have spent on this case?

More than I should have. It simply started as curious research into what te actual case against Knox was, since the US media never actually printed any of the details. They just made it sound like a g-7 partner decided to charge an American without any evidence.

What do you think of Rudy Guede wanting a re-trial now that AK and RS were acquitted of all murder charges?

I think his lawyers are smartly waiting for the supreme court's Motivations to see exactly why the case is being dismissed. Guede's conviction was final and has already been heard by the Supreme Court. My belief is that the only way the Italian courts can resolve the contradiction between rulings will be for an early release for guede.

If Guede want his case in retrial, it means Knox is back again ?

Knox will not be tried again for the murder of Meredith kercher, due to Italy's prohibitions on double jeopardy. Guede already testified regarding his accusation against Knox and sollecito, so any addition accusations would not really contribute to the evidence.

How could Amanda be at Raf's at 8:45pm and then the crime occur at around 9pm if it were a prank gone awry? Don't you have any better theories?

I said an argument could be made, and provided the outline for it.
As an aside, the time of death is contested; Knox's supporters claimed it was 9pm, because it provided Knox and Sollecito something of an alibi and because it fit with the "burglar interrupted" theory. However the time frame provided was between 9pm an 1am.

Do you think that Amanda was involved in the actual act of killing her or was just a bystander who did nothing to stop it? Marijuana does not make you a violent person so how could she react so violently?

I'm constantly amazed that people find the theory of a group sexual assault to somehow be incomprehensible. I'm particularly surprised that Americans have such difficulties with the theory, since a similar case happened right in their own backyard:
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/facebook-holds-clues-to-teens-gang-rape-6395031
"And for days, Patricia and Jessica had harbored resentment toward each other over a boy, several friends say. Patricia had begun talking to a young man Jessica had liked for months. Around 1 a.m., according to police reports, after hours of smoking weed and listening to hip-hop, Erica silently slid out a bottle of Mace. Then, without saying a word, she sprayed Jessica."
"In an emerging teen culture that values substance abuse, misogyny, hypersexualization, and violence, all the kids from this group use social media to annotate every drug score, sexual conquest, and swig of booze. The status updates, posted without concern for consequences, mark one of the few consistencies in the lives of South Florida's impoverished youth, who bounce from household to household without sustained parenting. Facebook for them has become a very public diary of delinquency and criminality — and it's updated no matter the circumstances.
By the time the kids allowed Jessica to leave, barefoot and slipping in and out of consciousness, Patricia Montes' last status update had already materialized on Facebook. "You're a hoe," wrote the blond 15-year-old, who would soon face charges of capital sexual battery. "Stop trynna act like a saint.""

View more

Language: English