I don't think you're familiar with the posts I've sent you on this if that's your stance. Something happening after someone says they're going to do it is considered reason to believe they did it by most logical people and courts of law. Like I said, I will admit any wrongdoing.
Well, I'm not a lawyer. At any rate, my point stands. Protests should've been anticipated. Costs of insurance and security should've been factored in beforehand and not sprung on attendees at the last minute. There was some less than ethical blogging going on which hardly met the highest standards of journalistic integrity. In the wrestling business, there are these things known as cheap pops. In journalism, the equivalent would have to be a misleading headline. The shameless spinning of facts would probably come a close second.