Jack Powell

I'm not going to pretend to know exactly what happened, because honestly I haven't spent much time on it. What I do know is there are a lot of inconsistencies with what actually happened, such as reports stating Adam Lanza, the shooter, died two days before the shooting actually took place, a little girl who was reportedly a victim being having her face shown in all the papers and news channels until a mother from across the country claimed that it was her daughter who was alive, the fire-drill like evacuation during the shooting caught on camera where people where just walking around in circles and not actually making any attempt to leave the area or get help, and the fact Adam Lanza was allegedly sat in the front of the police car when they caught him. What also makes me question the official story is why have we heard nothing of the event since? No trial preparations, no news from the jail where Adam Lanza is being held, no statements, nothing. This man shot up a school. We even get regular news from James Holmes, The Batman Killer. But nothing from this guy.

View more

Not to kill them for food, because there is a natural food chain we as humans are at the top of. Our emotions sometimes make us question the morality of such acts, which is why certain religions and ways of life only allow meat eating if it has been killed in what their society deems a "humane" way. I do however disagree entirely with using animals in tests etc for things which are not essential to our survive e.g cosmetic products... And although I'm not religious and therefore do not eat only food which has been killed a certain way, I do not agree with some of the tactics the food market uses (e.g the recent KFC scandal which exposed KFC for breeding chickens to be kiilled and eaten, with no beaks, no legs and wired to machines which pumped them full of fat). While I disagree with these methods, and will speak out on them, I feel it is useless to attempt to find food which has NOT been killed in an inhumane manner or bred to be killed, and to attempt to find products which have NOT been animal tested at some point. Even all of these "fair trade" and "animal friendly" products are never made without some form of suffering, so it really is futile to attempt to find products and foodstuffs which have been produced entirely suffer-free. And besides, even if it could be done, you as an individual are not going to make a difference. The industries will just overlook you as some sort of do gooder hippie who is not in their interest base and continue their operations as if you never existed, continuing to churn out overprocessed genetically modified food to fat shits who do not care what is in their food or how the animal died, and nice smelling fragrances to rich douche bags who couldn't care less about little bo peep who lost her sheep during product testing. I have the same attitude with saving the environment- Turning my TV off standby isn't going to do much to help. Directly addressing the issue of the big corporations and industries which damage the environment IS. And besides, while we're on the subject of global warming, the earth has been through far worse than we've thrown at it. So if turning off my light at night isn't going to have a massive impact on the environment, how, logically, is changing my diet or wearing habits going to have a massive impact on the animal tesing industry? It's not. That's the arrogance of mankind. The ability to think that we, as individuals, can make a substantial difference by doing one small thing. If we really want to stop animal testing and evil treatment of animals who are being bred for food (which I for one DO), we either need to get the majority of human beings on our side and to switch to non animal tested products and Kosher meat (which would mean the majority of humans would also have to come to an agreement on a justifiable and humane way to kill animals for food), which would then make a substantial dent in the animal testing and food industries, enough for them to possibly change their ways.

View more

There's more than just one theory. My personal theory is that the people behind the government ordered the government to carry out this attack to invoke fear and panic and be able to slip in The Patriot Act, a Bill revoking the rights of suspected "terrorists", and increasing surveillance on the average American Citizen, under the guise of "national security". Also mentioned in this Bill are compulsory RFID chips and the detainment of those who refuse the chips (And the rest of the NEW WORD ORDER, the words are actually used, I have read the Bill myself) without trial, without legal representation, and without any rights for an undisclosed amount of time. The WTC complex was destroyed using thermite and explosives, and commercial airliners were used as an add on, sort of an aftertouch. The Pentagon was possibly hit by a missile or some other projectile, given the shape of the hole and the precise area hit. This "terrorist" attack was used to justify not only the Patriot Act, but also the war In Iraq for oil, and the invasion of Afghanistan for opium. Osama Bin Laden has been declared dead multiple times since 9/11. He was travelling back and forth to and from America in order to receive treatment for his kidney dialisis, and he was a former ex CIA operative. Some believe him to still be alive, due to the lack of a released image of his body, others believe him to be killed not long after 9/11. I lean towards the latter.

View more