http://time.com/author/leigh-alexander/ Does this article subvert the narrative? Does this article create an avenue of discussion for those who want to talk about ethics in gaming? Does this article set the tone of the debate to quell the fire of harassment?
It's an article, it's not required to do any of those things. I think it's a very extensive introduction to a perspective of the events you might not agree with, but it's also important to remember it is not written to be for you nor me.
It's written to give an introductory understanding of what the events of the last weeks are to a audience that generally doesn't care too much for these sort of things, and I think that while you might disagree with this narrative of events, I don't think any of them are false either.
It's written to give an introductory understanding of what the events of the last weeks are to a audience that generally doesn't care too much for these sort of things, and I think that while you might disagree with this narrative of events, I don't think any of them are false either.