Why do you think many critics (mostly film) use such fancy vocabulary?
A broad vocabulary is useful because it affords you precision. It's the difference between "it was good" and "it was paced well and had energetic direction," except applied to more narrow/esoteric cases as you become more precise with your words. This is very important for critics, who are attempting to articulate very specific causes and results of craft choices, and really is a great help to anyone attempting to think more precise thoughts. Not just /articulate/ those thoughts - a broad vocabulary full of precise words even helps you process your feelings /internally/, offering you new mental avenues for labeling and assessing phenomena. Precise sentiments require precise words, and critics by their nature tend to embrace turning broad emotional sentiments into precise sets of stimulus->response craft reactions.
Granted, some people just use big words because they think big words are by themselves a sign of intelligence. But if you flex your vocabulary just to look smart when your word choices aren't natural fits for the points you're attempting to make, you definitely won't come off as intelligent. It's not the words themselves that matter - it's the thought patterns they enable or facilitate.
Granted, some people just use big words because they think big words are by themselves a sign of intelligence. But if you flex your vocabulary just to look smart when your word choices aren't natural fits for the points you're attempting to make, you definitely won't come off as intelligent. It's not the words themselves that matter - it's the thought patterns they enable or facilitate.
Liked by:
Patrick Duggin
deepbluejeer
Jayesh Kumar Gupta