How would you advise the media to cover people who transition publicly, like Chelsea Manning, in a respectful way? How should readers, who may not know about transition, be given background information? Thanks in advance!
I think it's important to mention both names in the first piece (after all, it's impossible to establish who you're talking about unless you mention the person's former name - however! This only applies to people who are already public figures pre-transition. In Manning's case, I think it would have been reasonable to say, "Chelsea Manning, formerly known as Bradley Manning..."), but from then on, only reference Chelsea. I think it's important not to stay too focused on the physical aspect of transition, and I can't really see a reason to go into the medical details unless absolutely necessary. I mean, in Manning's case, the question about surgery, something she didn't mention in her statement, kept coming up. That shouldn't have. Most importantly, if the person in question releases a statement (as Manning did, where she specified which name and which pronouns she'd like to go by), use the information in that statement to guide future reporting. Anything else, feel free to ask.
Liked by:
Dean Alexander
Blake Croissant