"It's just that it's annoying whenever I'm called an SJW just because I don't appeal to "their side" or whatever."
Uh, no. The reason you get called an SJW is because you keep making over generalizations about how all women are amazing and all men are terrible (like what you did in your new commentary). And you do this by either making blanket statements, strawman arguments or completely misusing statistics. i.e. what an SJW would do.
"I mean yeah I did come off a bit guns a'blazing but isn't SJW a bit of a rash label?"
Not if your new commentary combined with the first half of 2016 is anything to go off of.
"Doesn't make them any better than me rashly calling anti-feminists MRAs."
You're right, rashly calling someone an SJW for no other logical reason than you simply don't agree with the person in question is dumb. I consider anyone who does that an idiot.... So allow me to explain why your point is an apples to oranges comparison.
What we did on Berzurk was that we called you an SJW because, again, you kept making over generalizations about how all women were amazing and all men were terrible in your new commentary. And you did this by either making blanket statements, strawman arguments, several uses of the appeal to emotion fallacy, completely misusing the statistics or flat out not giving out said statistics for everyone to see. And given that this is something you've been doing for over half a year now, I think its perfectly reasonable and justifiable to call you an SJW.
When you called people MRAs, all you did was throw that label around to anyone who simply didn't agree with your stance on gender issues and decided to be vocal about it. That's it. There was no logic behind. There was no real reason behind it.
So because of that, what we did on Berzurk and what you've been consistently doing for over half a year now is non comparable.
View more