It was either a genuine attempt to highlight one of the many interesting possible outcomes of next year's election, or it was an attempt to smear him by linking him to an organisation that in many British people's eyes is still closely associated with IRA murders. As SF doesn't even attend Westminster, I'll leave it to you to decide which.
If you start digging now there's still enough time to get a pretty decent bunker together.
Um, that's not a question. But I haven't criticised PR. I'm all in favour of PR. I'm talking about tweaking one aspect of it which wouldn't affect the proportional representation of parties at all, just the specific individuals who were elected from each party.
I haven't - please do :)
Well, I suppose the latter are less likely to do anyone any harm. But I suppose being hardcore in your adherence to the letter of the Bible makes more logical sense, if that's not entirely the wrong way to describe it.
Yes. You need a little of both.
Still undecided. Was firmly Remain all my life, but TTIP and what happened to Greece have severely undermined my faith. Could go either way at this point.
What kind of sweets?
I don't know, but I'll start asking them.
There isn't a lot they can do. They'll whine about it, obviously, but that's about it.