@ZeroReq011

ZeroReq011

Which anime works would you consider feminist?

Guy produced a great answer (http://ask.fm/Geekorner/answer/126887291357)#_=_), and to personally add to that great answer is my just how I approach characters in anime and shows in general. Personally, I don't think we should frame our engagement with shows and the characters within them through a narrow definition of something being labeled feminist. Though as Frog-kun points out, a feminist lens is a no-less valued perspective (http://ask.fm/Frogkun/answer/128978283380), and people tend to reduce feminism into something which is not only anyway. Only a particular school of feminism (radical feminism) really attempts to frame the core of social relations within a predominantly gender paradigm. The more reasonable (in my opinion) schools focus on the intersectionality of various social factors in addition to gender (which has been otherwise ignored or marginalized as a dynamic of consideration for the longest time).
We should, first and foremost, approach them in terms of how they relate and resonate with the complexities of the human condition and experience, fraught as it is with systems of oppression. We should approach shows and the characters within them by the ways they not only accommodate or resist structures of social stratification (like gender), but how they navigate and negotiate with them as well.
❤️ Likes
show all
AnimeAtaraxia’s Profile Photo Frogkun’s Profile Photo

Latest answers from ZeroReq011

Wouldn't executions be better so that money won't be wasted on these kinds of people?

It actually costs more in the US to sentence people to death over sentencing people with life imprisonment. Death is kind of a big deal, it being permanent and all, so death row inmates are entitled to appeals to overturn or downgrade their penalties that can last for many years and rack up a fortune in legal fees.

Why would US influence be reduced over the Western allies that have abolished the practice of death penalties.

Our Western allies would be less willing to cooperate with, or at least accomodate beyond the strategic, any party that they have passionate ideological disagreements with.

To what extent do you believe that people should be judged by actions versus intentions?

Depends on whether or not you want to become friends with these people. As far as just working with them is concerned though, you have to anticipate how future actions by these people will be informed by their intentions, and whether or not those anticipated actions match closely enough to what you want to see happen.

How tolerant are you of a story/show leaving unanswered questions?

It depends, in part, on whether or not the story/show has been thematically conclusive.

I can't make sense of Obama's position on illegal immigrants. One day he's described as a deporter-in-chief for deporting more than any other prez, the other he supports the DREAM Act or uses an executive order to indefinitely defer the deportation of millions more? Can you make sense of it?

I would imagine that he's trying to find a balance on the issue. The humanitarian side of him would want to enfranchise undocumented migrants that have been living in the US for years and decades on end. The lawyer side of him recognizes that these immigrants still came here illegally.
It's also to Obama's (and the Democrats') political advantage to provide easier paths to citizenship to these undocumented migrants. These migrants tend to vote Democrat, after all. Republican opponents would and have naturally criticized Obama's and the Democrats's desire to make this happen a cynical political ploy to stack the electorate against their opposition's favor. Obama thus came up with the compromise you mentioned.

Language: English