Thoughts on the LeafyIsHere issue?
No idea who/what that is, don't care to know either.
Liked by:
The Common Sense Guy
❤️ Likes
show all
Latest answers from Jordan Redden
Thoughts on Illiniguy34 getting kicked from ODD for releasing a sex tape?
1. This question is a shining example of why I haven't been active on ask.fm and why I'm probably gonna stop using it soon.
2. I love how deliberately extreme and off the mark this question is in the hopes to get me to make myself look like an idiot.
3. if this is supposed to be a genuine, non ironic question, then make sure you know what you're talking about before asking a question like this (implying I would want to answer these type of questions to begin),
2. I love how deliberately extreme and off the mark this question is in the hopes to get me to make myself look like an idiot.
3. if this is supposed to be a genuine, non ironic question, then make sure you know what you're talking about before asking a question like this (implying I would want to answer these type of questions to begin),
Describe your day in emojis!
🛩🕍💥☠
Did Jacob and Rion leave ODD or something?
I dunno, I'm not in ODD. So go ask this to someone else who is.
http://ask.fm/PonderSprocket/answers/136239933539 Can you give your opinion on this?
I liked that post. Why ask me this?
What are your thoughts on Sargon's petition?
I think at first it was way too vague as to what the goal of the petition was going to be, so I didn't support initially. Now that he did later explain what the goals were in a clear and definitive way, I guess I would say I support it.
Can you give your opinion on this video: https://youtu.be/rPzwVust5UE
WAY too outdated for me to care.
Opinion on people who say that wearing provocative clothing will make you more likely to get groped, molested, and/or raped
Oh come on, I made a commentary explaining that for Christ's sake.
Do you think people should wait for the Ghost in the Shell live action film to come out before saying that it is whitewashing or not? Why or why not?
Absolutely. Because it's the material that makes a film good or bad, not whether the actor's race accurately represents the character their playing or not... Unless it's something like the movie "Aloha" where Emma Stone was supposed to be Asian, went out of their way to make her look Asian and makes people go "why?...". But if the actor is just playing the role straight up without that kind of shit, then there should be no problem.
http://ask.fm/laracroftjunkie/answers/137143014037 Thoughts?
"They keep bringing up my past, clearly implying that they don't want me to move on from my mistakes and instead just leave. Or maybe not. I dunno, it's whatever."
Sloth, real talk. I would love to see you move on from your past mistakes. I actually do want you to improve. I wouldn't be taking the time out of my day to critique you if I didn't.
The problem is that you're still doing the same shit you've been doing. Just under a new name. That's not moving on from past mistakes. That just comes off as a means to avoid criticism and to avoid making real attempts to better yourself as a person and a content creator.
Sloth, real talk. I would love to see you move on from your past mistakes. I actually do want you to improve. I wouldn't be taking the time out of my day to critique you if I didn't.
The problem is that you're still doing the same shit you've been doing. Just under a new name. That's not moving on from past mistakes. That just comes off as a means to avoid criticism and to avoid making real attempts to better yourself as a person and a content creator.
http://ask.fm/laracroftjunkie/answers/137143811989 Thoughts?
"It's just that it's annoying whenever I'm called an SJW just because I don't appeal to "their side" or whatever."
Uh, no. The reason you get called an SJW is because you keep making over generalizations about how all women are amazing and all men are terrible (like what you did in your new commentary). And you do this by either making blanket statements, strawman arguments or completely misusing statistics. i.e. what an SJW would do.
"I mean yeah I did come off a bit guns a'blazing but isn't SJW a bit of a rash label?"
Not if your new commentary combined with the first half of 2016 is anything to go off of.
"Doesn't make them any better than me rashly calling anti-feminists MRAs."
You're right, rashly calling someone an SJW for no other logical reason than you simply don't agree with the person in question is dumb. I consider anyone who does that an idiot.... So allow me to explain why your point is an apples to oranges comparison.
What we did on Berzurk was that we called you an SJW because, again, you kept making over generalizations about how all women were amazing and all men were terrible in your new commentary. And you did this by either making blanket statements, strawman arguments, several uses of the appeal to emotion fallacy, completely misusing the statistics or flat out not giving out said statistics for everyone to see. And given that this is something you've been doing for over half a year now, I think its perfectly reasonable and justifiable to call you an SJW.
When you called people MRAs, all you did was throw that label around to anyone who simply didn't agree with your stance on gender issues and decided to be vocal about it. That's it. There was no logic behind. There was no real reason behind it.
So because of that, what we did on Berzurk and what you've been consistently doing for over half a year now is non comparable.
Uh, no. The reason you get called an SJW is because you keep making over generalizations about how all women are amazing and all men are terrible (like what you did in your new commentary). And you do this by either making blanket statements, strawman arguments or completely misusing statistics. i.e. what an SJW would do.
"I mean yeah I did come off a bit guns a'blazing but isn't SJW a bit of a rash label?"
Not if your new commentary combined with the first half of 2016 is anything to go off of.
"Doesn't make them any better than me rashly calling anti-feminists MRAs."
You're right, rashly calling someone an SJW for no other logical reason than you simply don't agree with the person in question is dumb. I consider anyone who does that an idiot.... So allow me to explain why your point is an apples to oranges comparison.
What we did on Berzurk was that we called you an SJW because, again, you kept making over generalizations about how all women were amazing and all men were terrible in your new commentary. And you did this by either making blanket statements, strawman arguments, several uses of the appeal to emotion fallacy, completely misusing the statistics or flat out not giving out said statistics for everyone to see. And given that this is something you've been doing for over half a year now, I think its perfectly reasonable and justifiable to call you an SJW.
When you called people MRAs, all you did was throw that label around to anyone who simply didn't agree with your stance on gender issues and decided to be vocal about it. That's it. There was no logic behind. There was no real reason behind it.
So because of that, what we did on Berzurk and what you've been consistently doing for over half a year now is non comparable.