I wouldn't say so, but that's because I think labelling it true/false correct/incorrect would be a category error
hmm i don't think so, nothing novel or shocking anyway
Singer is convincing, but not persuasive (though he ought to be persuasive; that's our/my moral failing).
I don't say this to vegetarians obv, but actually have a lot less time for them - unless they're transitioning - than meat-eaters, in most cases. Because they know what happens. They know what happens but they still won't put the animals first. That's worse.
oaihajdfh;dsjf
who keeps asking me this
i literally don't have an opinion on anything around this topic
put this question in the idiot bin
STRONGLY disagree that it's sexist or PTSD (though many of the symptoms are similar). I really don't like any of the above view at *all*; there's enough grim stigma in the medical profession (and bloody everywhere else) that it's really exhausting. Doctors give up on you. I don't usually tell people I know about my diagnosis, because I think they'll judge me. Really tiring.
Hysteria was a genuine phenomenon, remember. Women did exhibit those symptoms. The fact that it's in part explicable through analysis of gender norms doesn't mean it didn't exist.
wow this is particularly odd as I started exactly that book a couple of weeks ago. have been rather caught up in things since, but it's something I've been desperate to read for ages (&, somewhat inevitably, adore what I've read so far) so am dying to go back to it.
thank you so much. x
it wouldn't be wrong
depends. your blood or somebody else's?
at ALL THE POINTS
that's so kind of you! my brother david took it, and I got caught in the middle of an eye-roll...