@B0bduh

Bobduh

Ask @B0bduh

Sort by:

LatestTop

Previous

Are there any critical theory texts or particular educational establishments you'd recommend for creative writing?

I get this question (or the related "what would you recommend for criticism") all the time, and I can never think of a particularly satisfying answer.
I read a bunch of "how to write fiction" self-help books in high school, and those were all largely crap, but I suppose they at least ground in basic, reductive stuff like the hero's journey, different narrative act structures, the significance of details, etc. And I just wrote a bunch, and then went to college and focused on writing there, and got critiqued a lot, and critiqued a bunch of Faulkner and whatnot, and since then I've just read scattered essays and kept trying to actively break down whatever I'm engaging with while writing my own stuff. Looking up interviews/general posts by writers you like is also pretty solid, though remember that your process is your own.
On the criticism side, I'd recommend checking out a good history of literary criticism - going through the various phases and styles of criticism really helps you see all the different lenses you can apply to the text. It also helps grind in that there is no "one truth" of criticism, and the counterpoint that /criticism can really help you understand and elevate a text/.
And on the creative writing side, there's no substitute for writing a ton, and for getting harsh criticism on your writing. And I mean /harsh/ - if you actually want to get any good, you can't rely on a hugbox forum, you'll need to find readers who demand quality. There are probably forums that are actually dedicated to kicking your ass, but I'm not involved with that stuff, so I wouldn't know what to recommend and what to avoid unless you just want a back massage. If you're in college, you can hopefully find either classes or support for that - outside of college, maybe see if your area has a local writers group of some kind. But the important thing's the writing. Look up lists of writing exercises (write a ghost story, write a story in second person, write a story about something lost, etc) and do them. Push outside of your writing comfort zone. Experience things and then think what story you could make of them. Write write write.

View more

Now that you've seen the first thirteen episodes of FMA, what did you think about the Nina Tucker episodes? Those are the ones you've seen so far that people often cite among the best of the series (there are a lot more coming). Also, are you planning to watch more of it soon?

Definitely the best of the series so far, not because of crazy drama, but because I found Shou Tucker and the related army politics pretty interesting.
I'll get back to it as soon as I've caught up on HxH.
Liked by: Rose Bridges

Related users

What are your opinions on the psychobabble overload that was the last two episodes of Evangelion and the last half of EoE? I wonder because frankly I hated it and couldn't enjoy Eva because of it, and I want to hear how you justify it.

That's not really something you "justify" - exploring those characters was the point of Eva. It's a psychological drama.
If you want to hear me talk about Eva, I guess you could check either my Rebuilds post, which has a fair amount of commentary on the original series, or my blurb from the top shows list:
http://wrongeverytime.com/2014/02/10/once-more-with-fury-rebuilding-evangelion/
http://wrongeverytime.com/2014/03/31/top-30-anime-series-of-all-time/3/

To be honest, I'm scared of Utena. You only hear about the complexity, symbolism and hidden meanings, so I'm afraid of just sitting there and not understanding a thing. Can you really "get" the show wthout any practice of analyzing stuff?

Don't worry, it also has surfing elephants and shit. And it's mainly just a great character story. And its big ideas are often the actual text, not any crazy subtext.

How to you tell if a sub translation is good or not then because it seems like I cannot tell the difference between a poor translation and a good one

I can't tell if it's faithful to the original Japanese, but I can tell if it's good writing that's elegant and good at conveying character voice. That's what matters to me! A translation will always be an interpretation of the source material, so I want to see a /good interpretation/.
Liked by: Rose Bridges

I stacked up with your blog post, ask.fm answers, countless other articles, several analysis and some videos on the matter. Am I ready to start Utena or should I watch in without referencing to outside influences?

You might need to buy some Utena figures for your mandatory Utena character relationship diagrams.
Just watch it however you want. If you like to watch shows while reading stuff about them, do that, if not, don't. Personally, I tend to watch shows without outside influence my first time, but that's just my preference. Whatever works for you!
Liked by: Rose Bridges

O_o on a scale of solid to liquid how hungover are you after last night's drunken answer spree

This morning was not the best. Feeling pretty good now though. Thanks for asking.

also do sub translations matter when you don't know any Japanese ?

Don't they /only/ matter when you don't know Japanese? If you knew Japanese, you wouldn't need subs.
And yes, they matter a lot - they're the vehicle for conveying the dialogue, of course you'd want high quality subs. A good translation can very easily be the difference between me loving a show and dropping it immediately. And "good" in the context of a translation doesn't always (or even generally) mean "most loyal to the source material," either - translation is a tricky thing, and preserving intent while adjusting phrasing due to the differences in prose between languages is a constant struggle.
Liked by: Rose Bridges

do you hate fansub elitists who insist in downloading everything in 1080p , and are obsessed over typesetting ?

Why would I hate them?

What do you believe are characteristics of a good villain?

There shouldn't be any "defining characteristics of villains." Great villains are just complex people whose goals run contrary to those of the characters we've come to care for, or whose circumstances force them to make terrible choices, or something similar. You can certainly make a /fun/ villain out of pure evil charisma (and there are other exceptions, as there always are - such as a villain who's more representative of an /idea/ than a set of human priorities), but great villains are generally human beings.
Liked by: Rose Bridges

How useful are comparisons and metaphors when making a point?

Considering fiction itself is generally a kind of humanizing metaphor for complex themes, I'd say "very useful."
Liked by: Rose Bridges

What are your thoughts on all-you-can-eat buffets?

That I generally can't eat enough to make the volume upgrade justify the quality downgrade.

How many bad metaphors do you have to weed out in your head before you stumble onto a good one?

A lot. Generally I start with one good sentence fragment idea of inspiration and then put a whole bunch of other sentence fragment hats on it, trying to find one that fits. Sometimes that ends with me having to discard the first bit and start over, sometimes I find a hat that's better than the head I started with and end up having to go back in the other direction, etc. I revise my sentences pretty obsessively.

Have you ever watched anything that left you baffled as to why anyone would like it?

Not that I can think of.

I think it's time for the serious questions! Do you wear pants when you're chilling at home?

Shoes too! I like wearing shoes.

Most people talk about visual medium's writing learning from literature, but is there anything in the opposite direction? Can literature learn anything from visual media?

You can't really form a coherent parallel there. People talk about shows learning from literature because shows often have /bad writing/ - i.e. they are bad at the element they are "loaning" from writing - but literature doesn't have "bad visuals." And books that take their cues from television or film writing tend to be pretty bad, because they're not making the most effective use of the tools that define pure writing as a medium. People have been writing books for a while, they've gotten pretty good at it.
Liked by: Rose Bridges

Talk to me about Oreimo.

Alright, last one, and this is a good pick for it. I seriously, seriously hate OreImo. Despise it. I think OreImo is basically a cackling villain that comes across, say, the protagonist of Welcome to the NHK. And instead of thinking "jeez, this guy needs help. How could we push him forward, maybe help him engage with the world?" it thinks "this guy is a fucking GOLD MINE. How can we make sure he NEVER BECOMES HAPPY. How can we ensure he BUYS OUR SOUL-HOLE-FILLING MERCHANDISE FOREVER." I think OreImo is just every cynical instinct of current anime producers wrapped up into one despicable package. I think OreImo is the devil.

now that you've had some time to collect thoughts (I know you needed em) how did you feel about episode 131 of Hunter x hunter

I might write a post. Most of what I'd want to talk about regarding the episode has to do with its aesthetic composition, so I could probably write about it without having to write about /everything/. I dunno, I'll think about it.
It was really good though.

Next

Language: English