Uff ich hasse sowas, doch wo ich nicht, hier traut sich kleiner..
Imagine a whole, imagine two parties/schools of thought, one for and one against/warwothy/possesive/dominant (because mom said so).
Now I'm order to make things work, we would in first place a platform that can allow everyone to bring things into the real world, accessible for everyone at all times, from practical knowledge, method's, working processes, tips, ways of using and integrating processes and exchange of proportional power as liability between parties.
Now since many of you already see what I mean, from each side start to be asserted some points in favour and some against.
Since when I talk about this, I look on both sides, it would be practical to have at global scale an complex interactions between everyone, based on levels of action, expansion of territory, width of useful interactions and offerings.
Now since we can think everything possible, each of the parties, still think for itself and behave as a whole, from the point of view, provide intel in order that, someone above and particularly interested into..some sort of extra exchanges, gonna be able to help out for purposes, that everyone can and have to know about (based on importance more or less, but towards the vertices total transparency).
Now follow me and you'll see it's possible, so calling the one at me with..ha ha good Humor, you idiot, I could build a new world from my room, still, I know I'm just a simple guy with some ambitions, ask someone about this work, some son don't know yet, calls mommy. Suk TiT 😇
Now since this can be an argument that can actually develop betterly on a paper, I'm gonna write it for myself. 😄
View more
