I don't mean to insult you personally at all, but really if you want random people to ask you questions, I would advise you to do this by reaching out, making a name for yourself and actually ask people questions that gets them thinking.Maybe you want to be popular or maybe you want to earn an audience for a product or maybe you just like answering questions; that's why I joined this site. I love being asked questions that entertain me and make me think. I thank people for those questions by sending them questions that I hope will make them think and entertain them.My point is if you want questions, don't ask for them - it's annoying. Instead, engage with your desired audience. Make yourself known and give them a reason to want to ask for your opinion.
If you could pick the 5 biggest mistakes humanity has ever made, what would they be?
#1. Religion. #2. Nuclear weaponry. #3. Almost every form of government so far (except for some attempts made by the Greeks) #4. The United States Patriot Act #5. Allowing corporations to have influence over Government business / congress.
I don't like onions really, but when I have them I prefer them cooked.
What do you think of the character limit for questions?
I'm not a fan myself, but I can understand the benefits of imposing limits.
On a scale of 1 to 10, how famous are you on this site?
Assuming 1 is "practically unknown" and 10 is "ARGH, SO MANY QUESTIONS! SAVE ME!" then I'd said 1 or 2.
Take a screenshot of your block list.
#1 - No. #2 - Why would I do that? #3 - That's a demand, not a question.
What was the last book you read in which you had the approximate thought: 'wow, what absolute shit!'
"Twilight" by Stephanie Meyer. No joke.
Do you have the S4C channel?
I believe I do actually, though I never watch it.
What do you think of VHS quality?
It is what it is. Sadly video will eventually become unheard of; was nice while it lasted but at least we are progressing.
Do you think it is fair to judge a book from our own contemporary opinions? For example, do you think the Nigerian author Chinua Achebe was right to called Joseph Conrad a 'bloody racist' over the novella 'Heart of Darkness' despite it having been published before Achebe was even born?
It's always a controversial topic, judging people of the past by their beliefs. Is a person wrong for being racist if such thoughts were the commonplace for the time? Some would say (such as St. Cuthbert) "Wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it and right is right even if no one is doing it." and some would say that ignorance is bliss.Can people be held accountable for their ignorance born of common-misconception? It's not for me to say. Personally I find no excuse for racism in our time and in truth the biggest cause of racism in the past has been Religion with men using scripture to separate white and black.