@MajedJarrar

Majed Jarrar

Ask @MajedJarrar

Sort by:

LatestTop

Previous

Sorry for that. A company needs a tool which the lowest price in the market is 100 dollar. The company sends Ahmed to buy it. Ahmed goes to a shop which is selling it with 100,but he gives Ahmed 5 dollars from the 100 and the shop takes 95,the written bill is 100 dollar,are these 5 dollars Halal?

No.

http://ask.fm/MajedJarrar/answers/140084588866 Thank you so much for caring for my life brother, may Allah bless you. The situation helps me to hide that, moving and traveling many times for work , there is no risk for death here in my situation , so is it Haram not to tell her about that ? Thanks

This requires personal connection of the asker. I can't answer anonymously. Pm me on Facebook.

Salaam Sheikh. As a Muslim man is it permissible to wear clothes or shoes that have gold on them, such as gold writing?

Alaikum assalam,
No. Let the disbeliever men of this world have it, it is exclusively to the believers in the hereafter.

People you may like

ArianaIsBack’s Profile Photo Ari ^-^
also likes
umaymen’s Profile Photo مهجة
also likes
Dinda
also likes
StephenInd’s Profile Photo Stephen Ind
also likes
Intaannnnnn’s Profile Photo Intana
also likes
swag___angel’s Profile Photo MUSTAFA"
also likes
mohamedebaid1’s Profile Photo Mohamed Ebaid
also likes
RahmaChips’s Profile Photo ama
also likes
enkhjikh’s Profile Photo Efertium
also likes
Want to make more friends? Try this: Tell us what you like and find people with the same interests. Try this:
+ add more interests + add your interests

Assalamualaikum. I am confused about the permissibility of portraying sahaba in the movies and dramas. According to most of the ulema, it is haram. But I don't know why it is haram.Some said it is disrespecting the sahaba. But I am not sure how is that the case? Aren't they teaching about them?

The majority of scholars say that it's forbidden. Some of the reasons are :
1. Acting requires adding so many details to their characters and stories in their time that simply aren't true.
2. The actors will leave an imprint, especially the youth, which could extend beyond the character to the actor. X will act as Ali, may God be pleased with him, then in a later movie the same actor will play a villain.
3. Relationships in acting are controversial, especially men-women interacting, such as pretending to be someone's daughter, or someone's wife, and all the subsequent portrayal of that relationship, while the actors aren't related in real life.

http://ask.fm/MajedJarrar/answers/140078081090 Basically, he has been arguing that the khilafah was a dictatorship that only worked because those dictators were of good character. But don't ahlul hal wal aqd, and the very nature of Islamic jurisprudence keep the khalifah from being a dictator?

I disagree with that aspect, and agree with the aspect that the political system needs to be thought in terms of the present day.

Al Salaam Alikomu Please , is it necessary to tell the second or the third or the forth wife that I am married already ? Please clarify for me with the proof because I don't know one for that and a friend told me that this is unfair for her . Thank you so much brother

Proof?
Lol. Saving your life is a proof bro.

Salaam brother A company which send a person to buy spare parts then he goes to an agent who sells him for 100 dollar (for ex.), it's price in the market is 100 or higher and the company's owner knows that, but the agent tells that person to pay only 95 as a price and 5 for that person's pocket=====

You totally lost me there. Start again please, who's selling what?

يا مولانا شركة اتصالات عندها خدمة دفع فواتير وتحويل اموال الخدمة دي بتقدمها عن طريق بنك تجاري يعني كل عميل عندة حساب في البنك بيتم فية عمليات التحويل دي السؤال ينفع اشتغل في الشركة دي في (it) مع العلم اني هتعامل مباشرة مع الخدمة دي

لا أدري
إسأل مفتيا في بلدك يا حبيب

Your thoughts on the points made here in general.. especially the use of the word "totalitarian" https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1819058601670421&id=100006988956079

I agree with most of what the brother said. Aside from choice of words, the point he wanted to deliver is that political systems of governance back then were determined based on the merits of the people and needs of the society.
The governance at the time of Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali, al-Hasan and Mu'awiyah - may God be pleased with them - were all different.
Claiming that Islamic politics have one favourite way of ruling, which is totalitarianism, is an erroneous claim made by the contemporary political Islamists, and he's suggesting that it's perhaps more to do with their greed for power, than general lack of knowledge of Islam that is causing this misjudgment.

Asalamu alaykum, according to saHiH hadith there is no difference in virtue between ajam and arab. Like the khutba from last Hajj. But then in books, like scholars as Nawawi, Ibn Qudamah and Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahumAllah) said arabs have virtue (fuduula) over ajam. Contradiction? Can you elaborate

They have the honour of being the nation from which the Prophet was born.
Similarly, the tribe of Quraysh has that honour above all Arab tribes.
Similarly, the family of Banu Hashim has that honour above all families of Quraysh.
This is a generally speaking.
As for the point which the Prophet clarified in the final sermon: an individual non-Arab may nevertheless exceed even a Hashimi in ranks of righteousness, because whosoever descend due to their deeds will not ascend due to their lineage.

Salam alaikum. I have made many MAJOR sins as cheating, lying, backbiting, missing prayers etc. I decided to make 'umrah inshaAllah. Can 'umrah expiate these sins? I know hajj do it but i dont have money with hajj only umrah now...i think with 'umrah it will be a new chapter in my life

Indeed. The Prophet said : A Umrah to another Umrah, expiates everything in between.

Assalaamu Alaykum shaykh, this might sound like a silly question but what type of questions in a duroos *should* you be asking even if the matter is clear to you. Question might sound ajeeb so sorry about that

Depending on the class size, and level of study, and your level compared to others.
If you're much more knowledgeable than the average, in a beginner class, then write your ultra smart questions down and discuss them with the teacher outside class.
Similarly if you're the least knowledgable in the an advanced class, and your questions are from a prerequisite knowledge.
If you think that 25% or more of the class will benefit from your question, then go ahead and raise it.
On the other hand, sometimes you'd have to set your goal to understand a lower percentage, say 75% of the material in class. It could be because of the teacher, or the subject, or the time, or yourself, or your peers.
Always use full etiquette in your questions. If in writing, start with Bismillah, make dua for the teacher before and after the question, write clearly and beautifully. If asking verbally, be respectful.
Last but not least, be considerate to your peers and teacher. If they're tired and you're hyper, or if the teacher is sick but you're healthy, think twice before you ask.
You'll find much more in books of etiquette of seeking knowledge.

View more

مرات الخال يجوز اسلم عليها باليد ؟

يحرم لو هي شابة، على المذاهب الأربعة
ويكره لو هي عجوز في رواية عند سادتنا الحنابلة، قاله في الكشاف، وذهب شيخ الاسلام الى التحريم مطلقا
ويجوز لو انت او هي دون سبع سنوات
ويجوز مطلقا لو انت بنت 😊

صليت ولما انتهيت اكتشفت ان في افرازات ... أعيد؟ &&

لو حسيتي بالافرازات أثناء الصلاة نعم
ولو غلب على يقينك انها حصلت قبل الصلاة نعم
وبغير ذلك فيحتمل انها نزلت بعد الصلاة
فلا إعادة حتى يغلب على يقينك انها باطلة

Is it from the sunnah to stand feet to feet literally in prayer? Some people force that on others

- Yo bro. Is it Sunnah to stand feet to feet?
- Yes it is.
- Cool. So it is okay as long as you're easy and considerate to the people adjacent to you in prayer?
- Yes, in fact it is obligatory to be like that.
- You mean it isn't Sunnah to force a Sunnah down people's throats (or toes)?
- No it isn't. In fact, a sunnah that leads to the inconvenience of the person next to you in prayer = becomes discouraged, even prohibited in cases.
- Wait what? Are you saying that some people can commit a sin by intending to follow a Sunnah?
- How many are those!

دعوه بالله عليكم عندي امتحان ومرعوبه 😞

ربي يجعل همك الآخرة ولا ترعبك حاجة غير مخافة فوات رضاه.
كل ما دون ذلك = هيّن.
أو كما يقول المصريون: في البزرميط.

السلام عليكم ما راي حضرتك في من تسافر وحدها للدراسة؟ اريد التقدم لفتاة احسبها على خلق حسن ودين لكن هي تريد ان تدرس في منتريال واهلها في اوتاوا. رأيكم مهم لي. جزاكم الله عنا كل خير 😊

الأمر يحتاج إحاطة بحالها وحال أسرتها. لو غالب خبرها مقبول تزوجها واحملها الى مونتريال 😘

As salam alkyum. What is the proof that blood is najas as you said? Any hadith that states it jazakallahu khayran.

Blood is Najis (spiritually filthy) according to the unanimous decision of the ummah. I don't know what those contemporary salafis were thinking when they - for the first time in fourteen century - decided to come up with this claim that the companions, and the tabi'een and their tabi'een, and the four imams, and the whole ummah, were all mistaken and issued a baseless ruling without a daleel.
If someone said but Abu Hanifa said this, they interrupt and say akhi, we only follow the daleel. If someone said: what's the daleel that x contemporary Salafi has on this matter they say, I don't know but he must know one he wouldn't speak without knowledge. Do you see the double standards?
The consensus IS the daleel.
Imam Ahmed was asked: "Are blood and puss are equal to you?"
He said: "As for blood, no one differed that it's Najis. As for puss, some have argued about it."
Imam Annawawi says: "As for blood, it is Najis by the consensus of the Muslims. No one has challenged that except some philosophers who claimed that blood is clean."
The consensus was reported by Imam Ahmed and Annawawi, as well as Ibn Hajar, Ibn Rushd, Ibn Hazm, Ibn Abdulbarr and AlQurtubi.
So when we say: those contemporary Salafis are clueless about Fiqh. It's not because we are jealous or have beef with them because of a few opinions in Fiqh. No, these are a tip of an iceberg. It's because their approach to Fiqh disregards the cumulative work of thousands of scholars of the ummah, under the claim of following the Qur'an and Sunnah. Not only it is chaotic and almost as anarchist as that of the philosophers and khawarij, It also has a hidden implication that the salaf were making up opinions without a daleel, which is a major sin!
If you claim that one of their contemporaries has no daleel, they'll fight you like you're the enemy of Islam.
Then they wonder why people accuse them of blind following of contemporary scholars.
The Almighty is the sufficient one to turn to for complaint and seeking aid.

View more

Assalamu'alaykum Ustadh.. Just wanted to ask you about this claim of Ibn masood's script of Quran having slight variation.. If that's true what was the reason for that? JazakAllahu khayran

The Qur'an was revealed verbally not in writing, and has been preserved verbally until today. There are things in the verbal chain of transmission of Qur'an are never written until today, and you can only learn them if you memorise with a scholar who has a connected chain to the prophet.
See number six for more:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10154354539328737&id=508038736
The entire Qur'an was written during the time of the prophet. The prophet had fifty scribes writing every verse as it was revealed, on pieces of skin etc. But keep in mind that thousands had memorised it in parallel.
In the time of Abu Bakr, the entire Qur'an was compiled into one book - from thereon called the Mus-haf. It was written according to Zaid bin Thabit, the main scribe of the prophet.
In the time of Uthman, the unification of the script was brought up. There were no dictation rules of Arabic yet, and each one of the fifty scribes may have written the sounds differently. For example the phrase: wa laata heena manaas, some companions wrote it as wala taheena manaas. The result of thorough discussion among all the companions in the time of Uthman on every sound and letter, was the Mus-haf of Uthman, Which took in consideration all input from the scribes and checked it against the agreed memorising of all the companions. The methodology that Uthman put was: if everyone agrees with Zaid, write it as Zaid did (in the Mus-haf of Abu Bakr), if there was disagreement, write it according to what the Qurashiyyeen (e.g. Abdullah b Zubair, Saeed b As, Abdurrahman b AlHaarith).
So they differed in one word: attaboot should it be written التابوت or التابوة, both pronounced the same. Zaid said with ة the rest agreed it should be ت so they wrote it as ت. And so on.
There was no disagreement which one was right or wrong, because again, there were no Arabic dictation rules yet. They were in fact canonizing them.

View more

Liked by: Kamrul Hasan

I'm a teacher in public school we have a group for all teachers and we visit each others once a month,I'm hijaby and they respect my religion&believes,this year we have a new lesbian teacher:( is it islamicaly ok for me to accept her visit to my house or go out for food if she is with the group ?

No doubt that homosexuality is a grave sin, even worse than someone having an affair with the neighbor's spouse.
However, homosexuality isn't worse than polytheism. It's established that Jews and Christians offer the centuries have change their originally-monotheistic religions to polytheism. Christians associate a son to God and Jews ascribe worse things to Him. That doesn't mean you can't have a professional respectful relationship with them. And perhaps your good manners and faith and upholding your religion firmly may pull them towards monotheism.
So no problem professionally, and try to keep a good circle of righteous friends to recharge and to prevent your heart from getting used to seeing sin.

Next

Language: English